Valve, the creator of Dota 2, has yet to update their latest Dota Pro Circuit (DPC) rankings on the official Dota 2 website for Tour 2 and 3 of the DPC 2023 season. What’s even more puzzling is that the DPC point values assigned to each team differ significantly from the numbers listed on Liquipedia, even when taking into account the lack of updates.
INCONSISTENCIES IN DPC RANKINGS
According to Valve’s DPC rankings, Gaimin Gladiators and Team Liquid currently share the first-place spot with 1060 points (excluding Tour 3). In contrast, the Liquipedia page shows Team Liquid at 1600 points and Gaimin at 1540 points. Even before Tour 3 placements, Team Liquid was listed at 1500 points, while Gaimin had 1240 points.
The discrepancies in DPC rankings have raised questions about how Valve calculates the DPC points this season. Teams have earned vastly different point totals for the same events, and there is a possibility of a significant shift in ranking positions once the rankings are finalized.
INACCURACIES POINTED OUT BY EXPERTS
Noxville, the founder of datdota and an expert in Dota 2 statistics, has highlighted the inconsistencies and miscalculations in Valve’s DPC point system. He has been monitoring the shifts in DPC points and pointed out the discrepancies that have persisted since the conclusion of Tour 1.
Several factors have contributed to the inaccuracies in DPC points. Some teams are missing points they earned from Division 1 leagues, certain teams have been penalized despite Valve’s confirmation of no penalties, and the penalty percentage itself has not been consistent.
VALVE’S NEED FOR TRANSPARENCY
Noxville suggests that Valve should release their “official” DPC standings after each tour’s conclusion to provide more reliability and transparency. Currently, Valve only publishes the points six times throughout the DPC season, which leaves room for confusion and discrepancies.
DIFFERENCES IN THE “OFFICIAL” DPC RANKINGS
While the “official” DPC rankings from Valve are what we have to work with, it’s important to acknowledge that other sites, including Liquipedia, are also considered unofficial. One key difference in the rankings is the drop of 9Pandas from fifth place to eighth place, placing them below Shopify Rebellion, who previously held the eighth-place spot. Additionally, according to Liquipedia’s rankings, PSG.LGD is the only Chinese team to secure a spot in The International (TI), while Valve’s rankings include both Aster and Xtreme Gaming.
REMEMBERING THE VIRTUS.PRO AND FNATIC FIASCO OF TI11
The inconsistencies in Valve’s DPC rankings bring to mind the embarrassing fiasco that occurred last year, which directly impacted Virtus.pro’s invitation to The International 11 (TI11). A correction in DPC points caused Virtus.pro to fall out of the twelfth-place position, which was then given to Fnatic. Virtus.pro was unable to secure a TI11 spot through the regional qualifier or the last-chance qualifier that followed.
It is crucial for Valve to address these inconsistencies and provide clarification on their point calculations to ensure a fair and transparent DPC ranking system. As the DPC season progresses, teams and fans alike eagerly await an official update that accurately reflects the teams’ achievements and determines their paths to The International.
FAQs
Why is it important for Valve to update their DPC rankings promptly?
Prompt updates to the DPC rankings are crucial to provide transparency and maintain the integrity of the competitive Dota 2 scene. Teams and fans rely on accurate rankings to understand the current standings and track their favorite teams’ progress.
What impact can inaccuracies in DPC rankings have on teams?
Inaccurate DPC rankings can have significant implications for teams. A team’s ranking determines their eligibility for prestigious tournaments like The International, which can impact their exposure, sponsorship opportunities, and overall standing in the Dota 2 community.
How does the inconsistency in DPC points affect the competitive landscape?
The inconsistencies in DPC points create uncertainty and make it difficult to gauge the true performance and standings of teams. This can lead to unexpected outcomes in tournament placements and potentially affect the narratives and storylines of the competitive Dota 2 scene.
What can Valve do to address the concerns regarding DPC rankings?
Valve should prioritize transparency and timely updates in the DPC rankings. By providing clear calculations and explanations for point allocations, Valve can instill confidence in the competitive community and ensure fair competition.
How does the past fiasco involving Virtus.pro and Fnatic impact Valve’s handling of DPC points?
The previous fiasco involving Virtus.pro and Fnatic highlights the importance of accuracy and reliability in DPC point calculations. Valve must learn from past mistakes and ensure that DPC rankings are calculated and communicated accurately to prevent similar controversies from arising in the future.
by 